ABSRACT
Sewage disposal is the process in which sewage is
transported through cities and inhabited areas to sewage
treatment plants, where it is then treated to remove contaminants to produce
environmentally-safe waste. Disposal of sewage waste protects public health and
prevents disease as well as water pollution from sewage contaminants. Many modern cities have
sewage disposal systems, and advancing technology has allowed for more
environmentally friendly and healthy solutions to disposing and treating
sewage. Sewage systems are part of modern infrastructure and urban utilities, which also include
gas, electric, and water supply. The major objective of the study is to
investigate the cause and remedy off unsanitary disposal off sewage in the
prevalence of malaria in OFFA local government area of Kwara state Nigeria.
Method use in gathering of data for the project are personal interview,
observation and questionnaire, a total number of 50 questionnaires were
distributed in the study area.
CHAPTER
ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
SANITATION is the hygienic means of promoting
health
through prevention of human
contact with the hazards of wastes as well as
the treatment and proper disposal of sewage or wastewater. Hazards can
be physical, microbiological, biological
or chemical agents of disease. Wastes that can cause health problems include
human and animal excreta, solid wastes, domestic wastewater (sewage, sullage,
greywater), industrial wastes and agricultural wastes. Hygienic means of prevention
can be by using engineering solutions (e.g., sanitary
sewers,
sewage
treatment,
surface
runoff
management, solid waste management, excreta management), simple technologies
(e.g., pit
latrines,
dry toilets, urine-diverting dry toilets, septic tanks), or even
simply by personal hygiene practices (e.g., hand washing with soap, behavior change).
Providing
sanitation to people requires a systems approach, rather than only focusing on
the toilet or wastewater
treatment
plant itself.[1] The
experience of the user, waste collection methods, transportation or conveyance
of waste, waste treatment, and reuse or disposal all need to be thoroughly
considered.
"Sanitation
generally refers to the provision of facilities and services for the safe
disposal of human urine and feces. The word 'sanitation' also refers to the
maintenance of hygienic conditions, through services such as garbage collection
and wastewater disposal.
Sanitation includes all four of these
engineering infrastructure items (even though often only the first one is
strongly associated with the term "sanitation"): Excreta management
systems, wastewater management systems (included here are wastewater treatment plants), solid waste
management systems, drainage systems for rainwater, also called stormwater
drainage.
There are some slight variations on the
definition of sanitation in use. For example, for many organizations, hygiene promotion is seen as
an integral part of sanitation. For this reason, the Water Supply and Sanitation
Collaborative Council
defines sanitation as "The collection, transport, treatment and disposal
or reuse of human excreta, domestic wastewater and solid waste, and associated
hygiene promotion.
Despite the fact that sanitation includes
wastewater treatment, the two terms are often use side by side as
"sanitation and wastewater management". The term sanitation has been
connected to several descriptors so that the terms sustainable sanitation, improved
sanitation, unimproved sanitation, environmental sanitation, on-site
sanitation, ecological sanitation, dry sanitation are all in use today.
Sanitation should be regarded with a systems approach in mind which includes
collection/containment, conveyance/transport, treatment, disposal or reuse.
The overall purposes of sanitation are
to provide a healthy living environment for everyone, to protect the natural
resources (such as surface water, groundwater, soil), and to provide safety, security and dignity for people when they
defecate or urinate.
Effective sanitation systems provide
barriers between excreta and humans in such a way as to break the disease transmission cycle (for example
in the case of fecal-borne diseases).[5] This aspect is
visualised with the F-diagram where all major routes of fecal-oral disease transmission begin with the
letter F: feces, fingers, flies, fields, fluids, food.
1.1BACKGROUND
OF THE STUDY
The United Nations, during the
Millennium Summit in New York in 2000 and the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg,
developed the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) aimed at
poverty eradication and sustainable development. The specific goal for the year
2015 is to reduce by half the number of people who had no access to proper sanitation in the baseline year of
1990.
In 2004, the Joint Monitoring Programme for Water
Supply and Sanitation
(JMP) of the World Health Organization (WHO) and of the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) reported
that the number of people lacking basic sanitation services rose from 2.1
billion in 2001 to 2.6 billion by 2004. As the JMP and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Human
Development Report in 2006 has shown, progress meeting the MDG sanitation
target is too slow, with a large gap between the target coverage and the
current reality.
There are numerous reasons for this
gap. A major one is that sanitation is rarely given political attention
received by other topics despite its key importance. Sanitation is not high on
the international development agenda, and projects such as those relating to water supply projects are emphasized.
In December 2006, the United Nations General Assembly declared 2008
"The International Year of Sanitation", in
recognition of the slow progress being made towards the MDGs sanitation target.[25] The year aimed to
develop awareness and action to meet the target. Particular concerns are:
·
Removing
the stigma around sanitation, so that the importance of sanitation can be more
easily and publicly discussed.
·
Highlighting
the poverty reduction, health and other benefits
that flow from better hygiene, household sanitation arrangements and wastewater
treatment.
The Joint Monitoring Programme for Water
Supply and Sanitation
of WHO and UNICEF has defined improved sanitation as follows:[26]
·
Flush toilet or flush /
pour-flush to a pit latrine with are connected
to either a sewer system or a septic system
·
Ventilated
improved pit latrine (VIP)
Despite continued efforts to promote
sanitation 40% of the world's population is still without basic sanitation.
This number does not tell the whole story, sanitation coverage is often much
lower in rural areas than in urban areas. For example, in Africa 84% of urban
but only 45% of rural residents have access to basic sanitation. The numbers
are similar in Asia where 78% of urban and 31% of rural residents have access
to basic sanitation (WHO, 2000). In many cases, improving sanitation can be as
simple as installing a well-designed ventilated improved pit latrine (VIP) or
composting latrine. However, in other cases, improving sanitation will be more
challenging, particularly in rapidly growing urban slums. Moreover, while
building improved sanitation facilities is a crucial health intervention, the
full health benefits will not be realized without proper use and maintenance of
the facilities and good personal and domestic hygiene (Carr and Strauss, 2001).
1.2
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
While writing the
project work, the researcher encountered many problems. Among which is the
negative attitude of the people in the
sense that they feel reluctant to give necessary information to help the
written of the project, it also give out for a long time to gather some
relevant information due to level of
understanding of the people in
area under study.
Another problem
encountered in the process of writing this project is the financial constraint
which is also one of the problems that affect the written of the research work.
Finally time factor is also part of short coming in build-up of the project.
1.3 AIMS
AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The
main objective of the study is to carry out a research is to investigate the
causes consequences and remedy of unsanitary disposal of sewage in the
prevalence of malaria among the people of Offa local government area of Kwara
state Nigeria.
1.
To investigate into the major causes of improper waste or sewage disposal among
the people of Offa
2.
To also carry out a research to investigate some major control of unsanitary
sewage disposal in OFFA.
3.
To investigate the relationship between unsanitary sewage disposal and malaria
among the people of Offa.
4.
To create awareness among the people of Offa on how to ensure proper sewage
disposal and its effect on the wellbeing of the peoples lives.
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The
significance of this study is to show how unsanitary and improper disposal of
sewage causes various diseases in the OFFA most especially malaria.
The
main significance of this study to;
1.
Attempt to assess the effect of unsanitary disposal of sewage on the prevalence
of malaria among the people of Offa local government area of Kwara State.
2.
Provide information to broader the knowledge and high degree of awareness about
various causes, consequences and remedy of unsanitary sewage disposal among the
people of Offa local government Area of Kwara State.
1.5 RESARCH QUESTIONS
1. Does improper sewage disposal causes malaria?
2.
Does unsanitary disposal of sewage causes drainage?
3.
Does malaria result to loss of people’s lives?
4.
Does improper sanitary disposal of sewage have control?
5.
Does people of Offa experience unsanitary sewage disposal?
1.6
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The research was carried out only in Offa
local government area of Kwara State, as geographical coverage, the writer
intended to have studied more than that, but because of financial commitments
of the writer and the extra time that would be allotted in attempt to assess
the causes, consequences and remedy of unsanitary disposal of sewage in the
prevalence of malaria among the people of Offa alone hindered a further study.
The content of the study focuses on the
investigation into the causes, consequences and remedy of unsanitary disposal
of sewage in the prevalence of malaria among the people of Offa local
government area of Kwara State Nigeria.
1.8
OPERATIONAL DEFINATION OF TERMS
1.
MALARIA
2.
WASTE MATERIAL
3.
SEWAGE
4.
UNSANITARY
5.
PREVELENCE
2.0 CHAPTER
TWO
2.1 LITERATURE
REVIEW
Sanitation facilities interrupt the
transmission of faecal-oral disease at its most important source by preventing
human faecal contamination of water and soil. Unsanitary sewage disposal practices are
responsible for a significant proportion of the world’s malaria infection.
Diseases due to poor water supply, improper sanitation, personal and domestic
hygiene cause 4.0% of all deaths and 5.7% of all disability or ill health in the
world. This burden is not distributed equally; waterborne illnesses
predominantly affect the poor and the young. However, when basic water,
sanitation, and hygiene interventions are applied, waterborne illnesses can be
effectively reduced. Low cost interventions such as composting latrines can be
used to reduce the transmission of many diseases.
Municipal sewage is a mixture of human
excreta and household wastewater that is transported via pipes to a treatment
or disposal point. In many areas, municipal sewage is often mixed with
industrial waste. Sewerage systems are common in industrialised countries and
often occur in urban areas of less-industrialised countries. In some regions
very little wastewater receives treatment before it is discharged into the environment.
In Africa, virtually no wastewater receives treatment before it is discharged.
In other regions, rates of treatment are not much better, for example, in the
Latin America and Caribbean Region only 14% of wastewater is treated, while in
Asia approximately 35% of wastewater is treated before it is disposed of in the
environment (WHO 2000b). Problems in waste disposal are not confined to
less-industrialised countries. Industrialized countries also need to improve
their sewage, excreta, and sludge management practices. In North America 10%
and in Europe 34% of wastewater is not treated before it is discharged into the
environment (WHO, 2000b). In the United States of America, the number of
detected waterborne disease outbreaks and the number of affected individuals
per outbreak has increased since 1940 (Hunter, 1997). Similarly, water quality
monitoring of major European rivers indicates that average coli form levels -
the organism present in human, animal and bird excreta - have been steadily
increasing for decades (Meybeck et al. 1990).
Currently, water-borne sanitation
systems typically use 50 to 100 litres of water to remove 1-1.5 litres of human
excreta per person per day (Jönsson, 1997; Van der Ryn, 1995). Moreover, most
of this water is used to remove urine (urine makes up 90% of the volume of
excreta) which poses little threat to human health (Esrey, 2000). In this type
of system, a small amount of faeces then contaminates a large amount of water
and nutrients that could be useful locally are washed away into other areas (or
removed at great expense in a treatment system) where they concentrate. High
levels of nutrients cause environmental damage and exacerbate the growth of
potentially toxin-producing algae. Clearly, sustainable sanitation alternatives
are needed.
For any social and economic
development, adequate sanitation in conjunction with good hygiene and safe
water are essential to good health. Lack of proper sanitation causes diseases.
Most of the diseases resulting from sanitation have a direct relation to
poverty. The lack of clean water and poor sanitation causes many diseases and
the spread of diseases. It is estimated that inadequate sanitation is
responsible for 4.0 percent of deaths and 5.7 percent of disease burden
worldwide.[7]
Lack of sanitation is a serious issue
that is affecting most developing countries and countries in transition. The
importance of the isolation of excreta and waste lies in an effort to prevent
diseases which can be transmitted through human waste,
which afflict both developed countries as well as developing countries to differing
degrees.
It is estimated that up to 5 million
people die each year from preventable waterborne diseases,[8]
as a result of inadequate sanitation and hygiene practices. The effects of
sanitation has impacted the society of people throughout history.[9] Sanitation is a
necessity for a healthy life.[10]
Diarrhea plays a significant role:
Deaths resulting from diarrhea are estimated to be between 1.6 and 2.5 million
deaths every year. Most of the affected are young children below the
ages of five. Children suffering from diarrhea are
more vulnerable to become underweight (due to stunted growth) which makes them
more vulnerable to other diseases such as acute respiratory infections and malaria.
Numerous studies have shown that
improvements in drinking water and sanitation (WASH) lead to decreased risks of diarrhea.
Such improvements might include for example use of water filters, provision of
high-quality piped water and sewer connections.
Open defecation - or lack of
sanitation - is a major factor in causing various diseases, most notably diarrhea and intestinal worm infections.[12][13] For example,
infectious diarrhea resulted in about 0.7 million deaths in children under five
years old in 2011 and 250 million lost school days. It can also lead to malnutrition and stunted growth in children. Open
defecation is a leading cause of diarrheal death; 2,000 children under the age
of five die every day, one every 40 seconds, from diarrhea.
The combination of direct and indirect
deaths from malnutrition caused by unsafe
water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) practices is estimated by the World Health
Organization to lead to 860,000 deaths per year in children under five years of
age. The multiple interdependencies between malnutrition and infectious
diseases make it very difficult to quantify the portion of malnutrition that is
caused by infectious diseases which are in turn caused by unsafe WASH practices.
However, based on expert opinions and a literature survey, researchers at WHO
arrived at the conclusion that approximately half of all cases of malnutrition
(which often leads to stunting) in children under five is associated with
repeated diarrhoea or intestinal worm infections Mas a result of unsafe water,
inadequate sanitation or insufficient hygiene.[6]
DISEASES CAUSED BY
LACK OF SANITATION
Relevant diseases and conditions caused
by lack of sanitation and hygiene include:
o Infections with intestinal helminths (worms) -
approximately two billion people are infected with soil-transmitted helminths worldwide; they are
transmitted by eggs present in human faeces which in turn contaminate soil in
areas where sanitation is poor.[16]
The list of diseases that could be reduced
with proper access to sanitation and hygiene practices is very long. For
example in India, 15 diseases have been listed which could be stamped out by
improving sanitation:[17]
4. Cholera
5. Cyanobacteria toxins
6. Dengue
7. Hepatitis
10.Malaria
12.Scabies
14.Trachoma
Polio is another disease which is related to
improper sanitation and hygiene.
Indicator organisms
When analysing environmental samples,
various types of indicator organisms are used to check
for fecal pollution of the sample. Commonly used indicators for bacteriological water analysis include the
bacterium Escherichia coli (abbreviated as E.
coli) and non-specific fecal coliforms. With regards to
samples of soil, sewage sludge, biosolids or fecal matter from
dry toilets, helminth eggs are a commonly
used indicator. Viable helminth eggs can be extracted from the samples and counted.
The term sanitation is connected with
various descriptors to signify certain types of sanitation systems. Here they
are shown in alphabetical order:
Community-led total
sanitation
Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS)
is an approach to achieve behavior change in mainly rural people by a process of
"triggering", leading to spontaneous and long-term abandonement of open defecation practices. CLTS
takes an approach to rural sanitation that works without hardware subsidies and
that facilitates communities to recognize the problem of open defecation and
take collective action to clean up and
become "open defecation free".
Dry
sanitation
The term "dry sanitation" is
somewhat misleading as sanitation includes handwashing and can never be
"dry". A more precise term would be "dry excreta
management". When people speak of "dry sanitation" they usually
mean sanitation systems with dry toilets with urine diversion, in particular the urine-diverting dry toilet (UDDT).
Ecological sanitation
Ecological
sanitation,
which is commonly abbreviated to ecosan, is an approach, rather than a
technology or a device which is characterized by a desire to "close the
loop" (mainly for the nutrients and organic matter) between sanitation and
agriculture in a safe manner. Put in other words: "Ecosan systems safely
recycle excreta resources (plant nutrients and organic matter) to crop
production in such a way that the use of non-renewable resources is minimized".
When properly designed and operated, ecosan systems provide a hygienically
safe, economical, and closed-loop system to convert human excreta into
nutrients to be returned to the soil, and water to be returned to the land.
Ecosan is also called resource-oriented sanitation.
Environmental
sanitation
Environmental sanitation is the control
of environmental factors that form links in disease transmission. Subsets of this
category are solid waste management, water and wastewater treatment, industrial waste treatment and noise
and pollution control.
Improved and
unimproved sanitation
Improved sanitation and unimproved
sanitation
refers to the management of human feces at the household level. This
terminology is the indicator used to describe the target of the Millennium Development Goal on sanitation, by
the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water
Supply and Sanitation.
Lack of sanitation
Lack of sanitation refers to the
absence of sanitation. In practical terms it usually means lack of toilets or
lack of hygienic toilets that anybody would want to use voluntarily. The result
of lack of sanitation is usually open defecation (and open urination
but this is of less concern) with the associated serious public health issues.
On-site sanitation
Further information: Onsite sewage
facility
On-site sanitation, also called decentralized
sanitation, is a system where the treatment of excreta or sewage takes place at the
same location where it is generated. Examples are pit latrines, septic tanks, and Imhoff tanks. A septic tank and drain field combination is the
oldest and most common type of on-site sewage facility in the U.S., although
newer aerobic and biofilter units exist which
represent scaled down versions of municipal sewage treatment plants.
Sustainable sanitation
Sustainable
sanitation
is a term that has been defined with five sustainability criteria by the Sustainable Sanitation Alliance. In order to be
sustainable, a sanitation system has to be not only (i) economically viable,
(ii) socially acceptable, and (iii) technically and (iv) institutionally
appropriate, it should also (v) protect the environment and the natural
resources.[19] The main objective
of a sanitation system is to protect and promote human health by providing a
clean environment and breaking the cycle of disease.
Wastewater management
Collection
The standard sanitation technology in
urban areas is the collection of wastewater in sewers, its
treatment in wastewater treatment
plants
for reuse or disposal in
rivers, lakes or the sea. Sewers are either combined with storm drains or separated from
them as sanitary sewers. Combined sewers are usually found in
the central, older parts or urban areas. Heavy rainfall and inadequate
maintenance can lead to combined sewer overflows or sanitary sewer
overflows,
i.e., more or less diluted raw sewage being discharged
into the environment. Industries often discharge wastewater into municipal
sewers, which can complicate wastewater treatment unless industries pre-treat
their discharges.[20]
The high investment cost of
conventional wastewater collection systems are difficult to afford for many developing countries. Some countries have
therefore promoted alternative wastewater collection systems such as
condominial sewerage, which uses pipes with smaller diameters at lower depth
with different network layouts from conventional sewerage
Treatment of sewage
Centralized treatment
In developed countries treatment of
municipal wastewater is now widespread, but not yet universal (for an overview
of technologies see wastewater treatment). In developing countries most wastewater is
still discharged untreated into the environment. For example, in Latin America
only about 15% of collected sewage is being treated (see water and sanitation in Latin America)
On-site treatment, decentralized
treatment
In many suburban and rural areas
households are not connected to sewers. They discharge their wastewater into septic tanks or other types of
on-site sanitation. On-site systems include drain fields, which require
significant area of land. This makes septic systems unsuitable for most cities.
Constructed wetlands are another example
for a possible decentralized treatment option.
Disposal or reuse of
treated wastewater
The reuse of untreated or partially
treated wastewater in irrigated
agriculture
is common in developing countries. The reuse of treated wastewater in
landscaping, especially on golf courses, irrigated agriculture and for
industrial use is becoming increasingly widespread.
Solid waste disposal
Disposal of solid waste is most commonly
conducted in landfills, but incineration, recycling, composting and conversion to bio fuels are also avenues. In
the case of landfills, advanced countries typically have rigid
protocols for daily cover with topsoil, where underdeveloped countries customarily rely upon less stringent
protocols.[21] The importance of
daily cover lies in the reduction of vector contact and spreading of pathogens. Daily cover also
minimises odor emissions and reduces windblown litter. Likewise, developed
countries typically have requirements for perimeter sealing of the landfill
with clay-type soils to minimize migration of leachate that could
contaminate groundwater (and hence
jeopardize some drinking water supplies).
For incineration options, the release
of air pollutants, including certain toxic components is an attendant adverse
outcome. Recycling and bio fuel conversion are the sustainable options that
generally have superior lifecycle costs, particularly when total ecological consequences are
considered.[22] Composting value
will ultimately be limited by the market demand for compost product.
Food preparation
Sanitation within the food industry
means the adequate treatment of food-contact surfaces by a process that is
effective in destroying vegetative cells of microorganisms of public health significance, and in
substantially reducing numbers of other undesirable microorganisms, but without
adversely affecting the food or its safety for the consumer (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Code of Federal Regulations, 21CFR110, USA). Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures are mandatory for
food industries in United States, which are regulated
by 9 CFR part 416 in conjunction with 21 CFR part 178.1010. Similarly, in
Japan, food hygiene has to be achieved through compliance with food sanitation
law.[23]
In the food and biopharmaceutical industries, the term
"sanitary equipment" means equipment that is fully cleanable using clean-in-place (CIP) and
sterilization-in-place (SIP) procedures: that is fully drainable from cleaning
solutions and other liquids. The design should
have a minimum amount of dead leg, or areas where the turbulence during cleaning is
insufficient to remove product deposits.[24] In general, to
improve cleanability, this equipment is made from Stainless Steel 316L, (an alloy containing small amounts of molybdenum). The surface is
usually electropolished to an effective
surface roughness of less than 0.5 micrometre to reduce the
possibility of bacterial adhesion.
REMEDY FOR
UNSANITARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL
The many attempts at
tackling the problem of the unsanitary collection and disposal of waste in the
MMA have been ineffective, unsuccessful and basically flawed as evidenced by
the lack of a structured intervention program or system. Thus, the approaches
need to be revised to be more effective so that in the final analysis, this
process produces a workable system. The major stakeholders, the local Public
Health officials including the municipal authorities, the international
community and the MMA communities each bring a unique approach that could help
resolve this problem. One critical approach mentioned above has been the
reluctance of the local officials to capitalize and improve the prewar waste
model system. The model poses a tremendous advantage for the local public
health practitioners and municipalities in engaging international counterparts
for support for revitalization and improvement of the plan. To date, there has been
no available resource recommending this approach. Another method used by the
public health officials is the ineffective use of waste management workshops
and the media. The message these outlets are trying to convey is unclear. The
outcomes of these activities should produce clear public health campaign
messages that directly provide information on what the public needs to do to
combat the waste problem in their communities. Promotion of mass hygiene
campaigns should be the key message of these venues, but such is not the case.
Instead, published articles and media houses fill news spaces with worthless
workshop information that derive no beneficial outcome. Another stakeholder,
the municipal authorities have a unique opportunity here to make the case to
the international community and aggressively engage donors for funding,
logistical and manpower support for a waste management project. The foresight
to engage the international community more effectively and aggressively is
completely lacking. The use of an aggressive media advocacy program to combat
the tolerance of piles of waste and garbage in the communities can be
approached from that perspective emphasizing the utmost importance of a disease
free community. However, the current behavior and attitude of the MMA residents
towards their environment leave much to be desired. A major problem that the
public health and municipal authorities will face is the development of an
effective approach towards an appropriate intervention program that directly addresses
the behavioral changes and perceptions of the community.
CHAPTER
THREE
3.0 RESESARCH METHOLOGY
3.1 RESAERCH
DESIGN
The main purpose
of this research work is to carry out a study on the CAUSES REMEDY AND CONSEQUENCIES OF UNSANITARY
SEWAGE DISPOSAL among the people of Offa local government area of Kwara State
Nigeria.
Data collection in any research is very
important aspect for the research to obtain adequate data collection for the
purpose and to collect reliable information about the topics the research made
on.
3.2 STUDY
POPULATION
The population for this study comprises of some
people in part of Offa, were dully observed and interviewed.
3. SAMPLE
SELECTION
The sample used is sample randomly techniques,
people were chosen by sample random techniques in some chosen area of Offa
[Nigeria].
The questionnaires produce is 50 copies, all
the copies distributed to the people in the study area.
Some were chosen for interview by random
sampling and those seen for observation.
3.4 RESEARCH
INSTRUMENT
Different instrument were used in collecting
facts on this study, the following were the instruments used.
ü Questionnaires
ü Interview
ü Observation
ü Oral interview
were also conducted.
3.5 METHOD OF
DATA ANALYSIS
The data collected through various researches
cannot do without coming across some difficulties, some of which are
highlighted as follows:
1) Lack of co
operation on the part of some people
sample for the interview
2) Lack of education
on the part of some of the people to
complete questionnaires
3) The distance
covered which make the researcher spent more money than initially budgeted for.
CHAPTER FOUR
4.1 DATA ANALYSIS
AND PRESENTATION
The researcher of this project has distributed
50 questionnaires to the people with the age range between 25 -35
SECTION A
TABLE 1: Sex of the respondents
SEX
|
FREQUENCY
|
PERCENTAGE
|
MALE
|
34
|
68%
|
FEMALE
|
16
|
32%
|
TOTAL
|
50
|
100%
|
The above table shown that male respondents were
68% while female respondents were 32%, that is shown that majority of
respondents were male.
TABLE 2: Age of the respondents
AGE
|
FREQUENCY
|
PERCENTAGE
|
15 -25
|
20
|
40%
|
26 – 35
|
18
|
36%
|
36 – AND ABOVE
|
12
|
24%
|
TOTAL
|
50
|
100%
|
The above table shows that age 15-25years were 40%,
age 26-35years respondents were 36 and above respondents were 24%, this shows
that majority of the respondents belong to 15-25 years of age.
TABLE 3: OCCUPATION OF THE RESPONDENTS
OCCUPTION
|
FREQUENCY
|
PERCENTAGE
|
STUDENT
|
22
|
44%
|
TRADING
|
10
|
20%
|
CIVIL SERVANT
|
18
|
36%
|
TOTAL
|
50
|
100%
|
The above table shows that 32% of the respondents
were students, 32% of the respondents were traders and 36% were civil servant,
this show that majority of the respondents were civil servant.
TABLE 4: RELIGIONS STATUS OF THERESPONDENTS
RELIGION
|
FREQUENCY
|
PERCENTAGE
|
ISLAM
|
20
|
40%
|
CHRISTIANITY
|
19
|
38%
|
TRADITIONAL
|
11
|
22%
|
TOTAL
|
50
|
100%
|
The above table shows that 40% were Muslims, 38%
respondents were Christian and 22% respondents were traditional. This show that
majority of the respondents were Muslim
TABLE 5: MARITL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENTS
MARITAL STATUS
|
FREQUENCY
|
PERCENTAGE
|
SINGLE
|
16
|
32%
|
MARRIED
|
18
|
36%
|
DIVORCE
|
9
|
18%
|
WIDOW
|
7
|
14%
|
TOTAL
|
50
|
100%
|
The table
above shows that 32% respondents were single, 36% respondents were married, 18%
respondents were divorce and 14% respondents were widow, this show that
majority of the respondents were married.
SECTION B: DATA ANALYSIS
TABLE
1: Does improper sewage disposal causes malaria?
RESPONSE
|
FREQUENCY
|
PERCENTAGE
|
YES
|
32
|
64%
|
NO
|
18
|
36%
|
TOTAL
|
50
|
100%
|
The above table shows that 64% respondents said Yes
while 36 respondents said No, this shows that improper sewage disposal causes
malaria.
TABLE 2: Does unsanitary disposal of sewage causes
drainage?
RESPONSE
|
FREQUENCY
|
PERCENTAGE
|
YES
|
25
|
50%
|
NO
|
25
|
50%
|
TOTAL
|
50
|
100%
|
The above
table shows that 50% of the respondents reply Yes also the other 50% reply No.
This show that majority of the respondents believed that unsanitary sewage
disposal can result to drainage while some of them did not believe.
TABLE 4: Does malaria result to loss of people’s lives?
RESPONSE
|
FREQUENCY
|
PERCENTAGE
|
||
YES
|
31
|
62%
|
||
NO
|
19
|
38%
|
||
TOTAL
|
50
|
100%
|
||
The above table shows that 62% of the respondents
agreed that malaria result to the loss of lives, while 38% do not agreed. This shows
that malaria is a deadly disease.
TABLE 5:
Does improper sanitary disposal of sewage have control?
RESPONSE
|
FREQUENCY
|
PERCENTAGE
|
YES
|
37
|
74%
|
NO
|
13
|
26%
|
TOTAL
|
50
|
100%
|
The table above shows that 74% of the respondents
said yes while 26% said No. This shows that improper disposal of sewage in the
society.
TABLE 6: Does people of Offa
experience unsanitary sewage disposal?
RESPONSE
|
FREQUENCY
|
PERCENTAGE
|
YES
|
25
|
50%
|
NO
|
25
|
50%
|
TOTAL
|
50
|
100%
|
The above table shows that 50% of the respondents
experience dentistry pain while the other 50% do not. This shows that majority
of people in Offa have in Offa experienced unsanitary sewage disposal.
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1SUMMARY
SEWAGE if left in an unsanitary conditions
without proper disposal management, can cause diseases and lead to infections,
even epidemics more especially MALARIA which is the major concern this research
work. Open dumpsters and uncontrolled garbage become breeding grounds for insects,
pests, snakes and rats that can infect children who play near these areas or
carry them into houses they frequent. Skin diseases, eye problems, diarrhea,
typhoid, scabies, cholera, intestinal parasites are only some health risks that
are created by the unsanitary disposal of waste.
5.2 CONCLUSION
Despite the present concerns of
individuals and the government about waste management in Nigeria as a whole, OFFA
is still faced with serious solid waste management problems. From observation,
domestic and municipal solid wastes are commonly found in OFFA. Domestic waste comes from activities
such as cooking and from human excreta. Municipal wastes are the trash from
commercial establishments, small industries, and households. These include
tins, plastic products, and polythene bags. These form the greater part of the
waste observed on the streets, in gutters, and the back of houses in OFFA.
Containers for storing solid wastes in
homes include old buckets, baskets, plastic containers, boxes, sacks, and even
polythene bags, which in most cases have no lids. Hence, the wastes are even
spread around before they get to the sanitary sites. Solid waste, when treated
well, can be turned into a resource, but the greater part of wastes generated
in OFFA seem not to undergo any treatment before their final disposal. They are
left in piles for weeks.
5.3RECOMMENDATIONS
Based
on the findings of the study, the following recommendations are made.
1. The
public should be educated by the AMA on proper sewage disposal and its related issues.
Basically, hygiene practices should be taught especially on radios,
televisions, in news papers, and in schools to educate people on proper ways of
handling sewage in order to avoid the spread of malaria in the society and
keeping the surrounding clean.
2. Stricter
enforcement of byelaws should be ensured by the AMA where administrative
penalties for minor violations should be taken with urgency.
3. The
byelaws on sanitation should be made to require every landlord to provide an
environmentally friendly toilet facility in his house.
4. The
AMA should make it a responsibility of introducing the use of standard bins
with lid for domestic and commercial use to the people in OFFA.
5. People
should develop proper attitudes and perception towards sewage handling, which
should be achieved through both formal and informal education.
6. The
government, donor countries, Nongovernmental Organisations (NGO) and other stakeholders
should be encouraged to donate money and equipment to the WMD to enable the
department acquire effective and efficient personnel and equipment.
7. Worker
dealing with solid waste in Nima should be residents of the area. With this,
they would be more responsible for their job and be comfortable with the
people.
8. The
community should adopt a self-help approach to solve the problem. Much can be
achieved when the various communities mobilize themselves and organize periodic
clean up exercises and by contributing financially to support the exercise, the
residents can also act as watch dogs and make sure that they themselves adhere
to proper waste disposal practices.
9. The
chiefs and other opinion leaders must be given additional roles to play in
ensuring environmental cleanliness. This can be done by authorizing the chiefs
in each area or community to take up the additional job of ensuring clean
environmental practices with the youth playing an important role.
10.The women should be made
to play an important role as it has been realized that women do a greater part
of solid waste handling and disposal in the community.
It
is hoped that these recommendations, when considered for action by the
government, local authorities, and the people themselves would help address the
unsanitary problems and its related issues in more especially in OFFA LOCAL
GOVERNMENT AREA OF KWARA STATE.

I'm here to give my testimony how I was cured from HIV, I contacted my HIV via blade. A friend of my use blade to peel of her finger nails and drop it where she use it, so after she has left i did know what came unto me i looked at my nails, my nails were very long and I took the blade which she just used on her own nails to cut of my finger nails, as i was maintaining my names, i mistakenly injured myself. I did even bother about it, so when I got to the hospital the next week when i was ill the doctor told me that I am HIV positive, i wondered where did i got it from so i remembered how I use my friend blade to cut off my hand so i feel so sad in my heart to the extent that i don’t even know what to do, so one day i was passing through the internet i met a testimony of a lady that all talk about how she was cured by a doctor called DR Imoloa so i quickly emailed the doctor and he also replied to me and told me the requirements which i will provide and I do according to his command, he prepare a herbal medicine for me which I took. He message me the following week that i should go for a test which i did to my own surprise i found that i was HIV negative. He also have cured for all kinds of incurable diseases like: Huntington's disease, back acne, chronic kidney failure, Addison's disease, Chronic Disease, Crohn's Disease, Cystic Fibrosis, Fibromyalgia, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Fungal Nail Disease, Paralysis, Celia Disease , Lymphoma, Major Depression, Malignant Melanoma, Mania, Melorheostosis, Meniere's Disease, Mucopolysaccharidosis, Multiple Sclerosis, Muscle Dystrophy, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Alzheimer Disease and so many. Thanks to him once more the great doctor that cured me dr. Imoloa so you can also email him via drimolaherbalmademedicine@gmail.com or what'sapp him on +2347081986098.. God Bless you Sir.
ReplyDelete